Key Findings

• Governance: There is a strong need to ensure that data efforts are centred on the lived experiences of children, survivors, and parents. Major blockers include differing jurisdictional laws and the lack of a global narrative around online CSEA. A positive example is the use of the Luxembourg Guidelines for aligning terminologies across sectors.
• Data Collection & Storage: The quality of data and inconsistency in classifications across countries regarding what data is collected and how it is used remains a challenge. Additionally, the efficiency of data collection needs improvement—better tools are required to streamline processes and prioritise important data gaps without overwhelming systems.
• Sharing & Processing: While some organisations have developed strong quality assurance frameworks, challenges persist around interoperability and trust in sharing data. One positive example is the Better Deal for Data, which has developed trust standards for data sharing.
• Use: A key priority is maximising the reach and utility of data, particularly in making insights accessible to policy makers, industry, activists and survivors through simplified, clear communication.